This was shared with me by Scott Castleberg of Michigan, one of our Personal License Holders.

Savicorp has been marketing and selling a device known as the Dynovalve. Look it up at www.savicorp.com and give your feedback here!

So, what should actually be a auto manufacture vehicle recall update, has been turned into an aftermarket product that essentially optimizes the manifold vacuum by gating the recovery of the blow-by gases from the engine to the manifold.

Not that the auto manfacturers would appreciate it but I would think simply rerouting the PCV to the intake plenum in front of the TBI would suffice.

There is also a copy of the change in California standards allowing it to be used on vehicles in California, indicating that it did not detract from the vehicles emission systems or OBDII operation.
And they have a "Letter of endorsement" from a Congressman.

hi guys,
this is same product different site www.verdatechusa.com/home.html .
Check it out.
I did background check on the savicorp company via the internet.They are on the stock market. It looks to me like the company has had its debts wiped $2.4 million {having only 5 employees ... what the ....? ) and now they are not their own boss.
Below are the links where I got my data from.
www.savicorp.com/boards/t/9/texas-tyr-to...o-emission-huge.aspx
www.slideshare.net/MicStockwell/savicorp-svmi
finance.yahoo.com/news/SaviCorp-Finalize...078519.html?x=0&.v=1
It looks like they are being set up to be part of the "approved" companies to install emissions solutions.Big big bucks.
My viewpoint only

Hi Guys,

I heard of the Dyno Valve from another friend, also into alternative energy and fuel saving technology. Personally, I think $399.00 is very pricey for an electric PCV valve, which, as Ron told me, helps to better control vacuum than the stock system, but not like we do. According to Savicorp's video, the valve is controlled by a small, programmable computer chip, which get's a signal from a timing source.

Personally, I know the Groove is the way to go. It has a larger impact on the engine fuel wise than the Dyno Valve could. If you look at some of Dyno Valve's fuel figures, they seem far fetched.

And that is my opinion.

Scott

I agree Scott. The 50 cent plug on the intake manifold controls the PCV very effectively.

I went back and looked at some of their test data again and it isn't just their reported results that could be found questionable. Their test methods are not consistent with coming to solid conclusions.

You don't take device "A" and test it on vehicle 1 and 2 then take device "B" and test it on vehicle 3 and 4, the baseline and vehicle data are inconsistent at the start.

Proper testing would be 2 vehicles with both devices tested on both vehicles to get comparable results and if there is questions you take them back to baseline and test again.

Rather interesting, what seems to be a political push to make the product available on the market.